Saturday, March 21, 2020

Who really wrote shakespeares work Essay Example For Students

Who really wrote shakespeares work Essay Who really wrote Shakespeares works? One of the most well-known writers in history is also one of the most controversial writers. William Shakespeare has been credited to thirty-eight plays, but did he actually write all of them. The debate whether he wrote all of his plays has been debated for generations. One of the main reasons was if his education level was high enough to be a world-famous writer. But if Shakespeare didnt write his works, then who did?One of the most controversial and accused writers was Sir Francis Bacon. Sir Francis Bacon was a great scientist and a great writer. He was a well-educated man and his educated level was higher and more advanced than William Shakespeare. He had enough education to write master pieces of Shakespeares caliber. I think the reason he didnt write Shakespeare work was that his literature and writing style was more sophisticated. The way Shakespeare wrote was a type that couldnt be learned in school it was just talent thats why it didnt m atter how high your level of education was. We will write a custom essay on Who really wrote shakespeares work specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now Edward de Vere was another writer though to have written the work of Shakespeare. Since the 1930s de Vere has been strongly advanced as the true author of Shakespeares plays. De Vere represents the social-elitist stratum of the theorists, who believe that a commoner could never have accomplish such genius. De Vere was a nobleman of Queen Elizabeth Is court. Charlton Ogburn an author thought that parallels of the Earls life with materials from the plays. Similarities between Polonius of Hamlet and the Earls Guardian, William Cecil, was thought to be one the biggest pieces of evidences against Shakespeare. The Earl of Oxford stopped writing at an early age, but thought still to be writing under the name of Shakespeare after. The fact that the Earl died before some of Shakespeares last plays were produced really hurt the argument that de Vere wrote Shakespeares works. Other writers such as William Stanley, Earl of derby, Ben Johnson, Thomas Middleton, Sir Walter Raleigh, Queen Elizabeth I and Christopher Marlowe. Christopher Marlowe would have been the perfect ghost writer. He was killed in a tavern fight in 1953. Legend has it that Christopher Marlowe really didnt die. He was a spy of the Queen and able to fake his death. Supposedly Marlowe went on writing the works credited to Shakespeare for many years under the pin name of Shakespeare. The fact that there is no really convincing evidence the story is at the back of the line. Ever since Shakespeare death many have tried to discredit Shakespeare as the writer, but none have seriously threatened the man from Stratford. In 1564, William Shakespeare was born in Stratford, a small town in northwest of London. His father name was John Shakespeare and his mother was Mary Arden Shakespeare. John Shakespeare was a glove maker and also held a position in the local government. When William Shakespeare was seven when he attended the Stratford Grammar School. This school was a strict, dull and demanding school. The teachers werent known for stirring the imagination of the student, they just studied the basics. Shakespeare started as a actor and got his foot in the door. With his acting experience in theatre he began writing. By 1594, he was huge in the London theatre business. He wrote about two plays a year when he was with Lord Chamberlains men. In 1599, Shakespeare and six associates became owners of the Globe, a new outdoor theatre in London. It was one of the biggest theatres of its time, it held about 3,000 spectators. Shakespeare wrote about 37 plays divided into three categories, comedies, histories, and tragedies. He was the greatest writer of his time and a very talented artist. .u6686db49c46fb83be56a91aa33b7157c , .u6686db49c46fb83be56a91aa33b7157c .postImageUrl , .u6686db49c46fb83be56a91aa33b7157c .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .u6686db49c46fb83be56a91aa33b7157c , .u6686db49c46fb83be56a91aa33b7157c:hover , .u6686db49c46fb83be56a91aa33b7157c:visited , .u6686db49c46fb83be56a91aa33b7157c:active { border:0!important; } .u6686db49c46fb83be56a91aa33b7157c .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .u6686db49c46fb83be56a91aa33b7157c { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .u6686db49c46fb83be56a91aa33b7157c:active , .u6686db49c46fb83be56a91aa33b7157c:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .u6686db49c46fb83be56a91aa33b7157c .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .u6686db49c46fb83be56a91aa33b7157c .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .u6686db49c46fb83be56a91aa33b7157c .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .u6686db49c46fb83be56a91aa33b7157c .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .u6686db49c46fb83be56a91aa33b7157c:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .u6686db49c46fb83be56a91aa33b7157c .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .u6686db49c46fb83be56a91aa33b7157c .u6686db49c46fb83be56a91aa33b7157c-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .u6686db49c46fb83be56a91aa33b7157c:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: Sunbeam Corporation and Chainsaw Al EssayWhat hurts Shakespeares case for writing all of his works was his education level. He had basic schooling but no university education. Some say his writings are writings not learned in school and that his writings are just pure talent. But Robert Greene said that Shakespeare as an actor thought he could write as well or better than well-educated writers. Most great writers have a good educational background, but Shakespeare doesnt so that will always have some cause for debate. The debate of whether Shakespeare wrote his works will be debated for years. Both sides have strong arguments but neither have enough evidence to prove the other wrong, the thing we know is that whoever wrote them they did a spectacular job. So if you cant decide who the author is, just know that they are wonderful masterpieces. Words/ Pages : 955 / 24

Thursday, March 5, 2020

An Analysis Of Chimes Of Slience Essays - Yoruba People, Literature

An Analysis Of Chimes Of Slience Essays - Yoruba People, Literature An Analysis Of Chimes Of Slience An Analysis of Chimes of Slience Wole Soyinka is a Nigerian playwright, and the author of the prose poem Chimes of Silence. In order to describe his experience in solitary confinement Soyinka uses descriptive language involving his vision to better enlighten the reader to his experience. The most dramatic passages in Chimes of Silence describe his limited vision, which expresses to the reader how difficult and horrible of an experience it must have been. Soyinkas efforts to see any sign of life through peepholes in order to have some way of connecting with the outside world, shows just how lonely he really is. The poem opens with Soyinka struggling to see through a peephole in the door of his cell. His interest in the boring details outside of his cell shows just how lonely he is, and how much he longs to have any kind of contact with reality. A little square hole cut in the door, enough for a goalers fist to passenough for me tosteal a quick look at the rare flash of a hand, a face, a gesture(140). Soyinka is desperate to see anything that he can relate to human life. Anything that assures him that even though he has no contact with humans that life is still going on. Anything that reminds him that theres the possibility that he could one day enter back into the life that he has been exiled from. Soyinka continues describing things he strains to see thorough the peephole including, more often a blur of khaki, the square planted rear of the guard on the other side (140). Not only does Soyinka strain to see any part of the human body itself, but also anything else that reminds him of human beings. Something we take for granted everyday Soyinka finds as a connection to the outside world. Its clear through his description of vision seeing through the peephole that Soyinka is desperate for human interaction and is clearly very lonely. Later in the essay Soyinka makes reference to the limited but present amount of sky that he is able to see in his cell; a sky the size of a napkin trapped by small spikes and broken bottles, but a sky (140). Through his describing the sky Soyinka finds another way of connecting to the outside world. The sky that he looks upon is the same one that people look upon everyday, and to him it makes the correlation to the human life he longs to be living. Soyinka knows that when he was once living and surrounded by human contact that he was covered by the same sky that he sees in his cell. It serves as a reminder to him that although trapped he can still carry a piece of his old life within him. His memories of his old life can help make up for the emptiness inside of him in his time of being alone. Soyinka also describes the birds he can see from his cell, Vultures perch on a roof just visible from another yard. And crows. Egrets overfly my crypt and bats swarm at sunset (140). Through his description of the birds Soyinka once again describes something living in order to make up for the fact that he feels so alone, and in a sense dead. It seems that in Soyinkas description of the birds that he almost longs to be them, to be able to fly and be free. Soyinka envies the birds for they arent trapped alone and they have access to the world unlike him. Soyinka eventually discovers a new peephole in his cell and once again he strains to see anything he can to keep himself from being so lonely. Soyinka talks of counting feet walking by in order to keep some kind of reality And now feetthe procession goes by and I count (141). By counting the feet Soyinka can establish the slightest relationship to any kind of outside life. Its almost as if by counting the feet Soyinka can relate to the prisoners and make up for the emptiness he is feeling, and not seem to be so alone. Although they arent trapped there with him the